<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Charles Darwin film &#8216;too controversial for religious America&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/</link>
	<description>Spirituality Made Sweet</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:42:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Nea</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator>Nea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 15:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-402</guid>
		<description>I would love to see this movie. If only people in the States would be a little more open-minded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to see this movie. If only people in the States would be a little more open-minded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abby</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-398</link>
		<dc:creator>Abby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:14:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-398</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m amazed that anyone in this day and age could still have a problem with evolution. Even if people don&#039;t believe or agree with the idea, at the very least, they should have an tolerant mind to other people&#039;s beliefs. I mean, ye-gads, are we going to stop showing movies with anything but Christian beliefs in them?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m amazed that anyone in this day and age could still have a problem with evolution. Even if people don&#8217;t believe or agree with the idea, at the very least, they should have an tolerant mind to other people&#8217;s beliefs. I mean, ye-gads, are we going to stop showing movies with anything but Christian beliefs in them?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-397</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-397</guid>
		<description>@Nobrit - uh, ok. 

Thank you for the crazy. 

Hadnt had much of that on here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nobrit &#8211; uh, ok. </p>
<p>Thank you for the crazy. </p>
<p>Hadnt had much of that on here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: No Brit</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator>No Brit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 17:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-396</guid>
		<description>Everybody knows The Americans are another species the british HATE with an unbridled passion.

The british hate that The Americans are another species, so they’re trying to make them look like… get this… religious people. HAHAHAHA The brits are such poor losers. They invented Afrocentrism to fool the Africans into building their Israel, but that didn’t work. And they NEVER fooled The Americans from Day 0. Columbus couldn’t even do that!!

The british are such dumb, poor and hateful religious liars, losers and cowards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everybody knows The Americans are another species the british HATE with an unbridled passion.</p>
<p>The british hate that The Americans are another species, so they’re trying to make them look like… get this… religious people. HAHAHAHA The brits are such poor losers. They invented Afrocentrism to fool the Africans into building their Israel, but that didn’t work. And they NEVER fooled The Americans from Day 0. Columbus couldn’t even do that!!</p>
<p>The british are such dumb, poor and hateful religious liars, losers and cowards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hollynoel001</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-395</link>
		<dc:creator>hollynoel001</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 03:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-395</guid>
		<description>people can be so closed-minded thinking that thier way is the only way and that is not true individuals should be able to make up their own minds and decide what they want to believe not what someone else thinks we should believe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people can be so closed-minded thinking that thier way is the only way and that is not true individuals should be able to make up their own minds and decide what they want to believe not what someone else thinks we should believe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-394</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-394</guid>
		<description>@James - I hope you&#039;re right, and its just a marketing gimmick.

@Mark - well, all one can do is try and draw attention to it.

@ Renee - Im sure it will find a distributor. Controversy usually = gold.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@James &#8211; I hope you&#8217;re right, and its just a marketing gimmick.</p>
<p>@Mark &#8211; well, all one can do is try and draw attention to it.</p>
<p>@ Renee &#8211; Im sure it will find a distributor. Controversy usually = gold.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Renee M</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Renee M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 23:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-393</guid>
		<description>How embarrassing for us, really.  I hope it finds a distributor here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How embarrassing for us, really.  I hope it finds a distributor here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Charles Darwin film ‘too controversial for religious America’ &#124; Spiritual Mind -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-392</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Charles Darwin film ‘too controversial for religious America’ &#124; Spiritual Mind -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-392</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by novenator, Jaison Simmons, Serenity Satoru, OrgaNickz813 and others. OrgaNickz813 said: RT: @alapoet: Charles Darwin film ‘too controversial for religious America’ &#124; Spiritual Mind http://bit.ly/Ypuzs [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by novenator, Jaison Simmons, Serenity Satoru, OrgaNickz813 and others. OrgaNickz813 said: RT: @alapoet: Charles Darwin film ‘too controversial for religious America’ | Spiritual Mind <a href="http://bit.ly/Ypuzs" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/Ypuzs</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark P.</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-390</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark P.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 15:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-390</guid>
		<description>Our forefathers left England 230 years ago to escape religious oppression. Now, our nation is oppressed by a religion that prohibits progression through science.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our forefathers left England 230 years ago to escape religious oppression. Now, our nation is oppressed by a religion that prohibits progression through science.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Baquet</title>
		<link>http://spiritualmind.com/2009/09/charles-darwin-film-too-controversial-religious-america/comment-page-1/#comment-389</link>
		<dc:creator>James Baquet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 13:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spiritualmind.com/?p=1046#comment-389</guid>
		<description>OK, I read the Guardian article. Admittedly, I read nothing else. But nowhere do I see a quote from a distributor saying, in essence, &quot;We will not distribute this film because it will be divisive&quot; etc etc etc.

I see: &quot;However, US distributors have resolutely passed on a film which will prove hugely divisive...&quot; It does NOT say that that&#039;s WHY they passed on it.

So what we have is a filmmaker (=promoter) claiming that this is the reason, and everyone reacting to his characterization of the reason.

I&#039;m not naive; I know what a hot-button topic evolution is in America. But is there any chance that the filmmaker is using this to drum up a little interest? Could &quot;Spiritual Mind&quot; have fallen victim to hype?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I read the Guardian article. Admittedly, I read nothing else. But nowhere do I see a quote from a distributor saying, in essence, &#8220;We will not distribute this film because it will be divisive&#8221; etc etc etc.</p>
<p>I see: &#8220;However, US distributors have resolutely passed on a film which will prove hugely divisive&#8230;&#8221; It does NOT say that that&#8217;s WHY they passed on it.</p>
<p>So what we have is a filmmaker (=promoter) claiming that this is the reason, and everyone reacting to his characterization of the reason.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not naive; I know what a hot-button topic evolution is in America. But is there any chance that the filmmaker is using this to drum up a little interest? Could &#8220;Spiritual Mind&#8221; have fallen victim to hype?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
